9.8.13
cc: Barry
O’Farrelloffice@premier.nsw.gov.au;
Brad
Hazzard,office@hazzard.minister.nsw.gov.au
RE: State Environmental Planning Policy (Mining,
Petroleum Production and Extractive Industries) Amendment (Resource
Significance) 2013
OBJECTION
The Running Stream
Water Users Association (RSWUA) is a community-based organisation with over 100
members dedicated to the preservation of the water resource of the
Ilford/Running Stream area in Central NSW. RSWUA vehemently opposes the
proposed changes to the above SEPP.
The current SEPP requires
other land uses, impacts on water, biodiversity and climate to be considered by
the consent authority before determining an application for mining, petroleum
production or extractive industry development. The proposed changes to the SEPP
would require the consent authority to make the significance of the resource
the consent authority’s principal consideration.
This is totally unacceptable. In
particular, RSWUA is appalled that the draft policy reverses the intention
of the Aquifer Interference Policy.
Water is our most precious resource on this, the driest inhabited continent,
and it is therefore totally unacceptable
for state significant development to be exempt from the minimal impact
standards in the Aquifer Interference
Policy. The policy must be made binding for all development, including
mining and coal seam gas.
There must be better
protection for our drinking water catchments from physical damage and water
pollution by prohibiting any mining from occurring in water catchment areas.
In addition, RSWUA is
strongly opposed to ‘one way’ standards that prevent consent authorities from properly
assessing environmental risks associated with individual mining proposals,
including impacts on sensitive rural industries and vulnerable populations
(including young children and the elderly).
Particulate
matter (PM) that is generated from coal mining can cause serious health impacts
including asthma, respiratory and cardiac disease, damage lungs and increase
the risk of premature death.
Enforceable pollution controls and standards that truly protect communities
must be developed.
RSWUA also finds it
unacceptable to merely ‘consider’ the advice of the Office of Environment and
Heritage on biodiversity impacts. The
SEPP should reflect the government’s recently announced commitment to a ‘net
positive’ standard for biodiversity impacts from state significant development.
Finally, the recent ICAC hearings have well and
truly exposed the dangers of giving Ministers broad discretion when assessing
mining projects. The Minister should not be given this kind of power. This
ill-conceived proposal puts the narrow interests of the mining companies above
the interests of ordinary people and existing rural industries.
RSWUA urges you to abandon this proposal as a
matter of urgency and re-draft the SEPP to include binding environmental protection standards for
air, water, noise and vibration to provide real protection for local
communities and the environment.
I welcome the opportunity
to meet with you and discuss this matter further.
Yours sincerely,
Nell Schofield
President
RSWUA
0413746909